[numberonepal]

The only caution he gave was not buying into every and any prediction given by Q, in particular regarding when and how Trump might get back into office.

That should be easy since Q never said anything of the sort.

[mbrfl]

Well he was making a broader point that people shouldn’t automatically believe every theory they hear, whether it be a particular prediction by Q or by anyone else. Patel was a little vague about who he was talking about regarding predictions of Trump coming back before 2024. He never outright claimed Q made such a prediction but was lumping together actual Q predictions with predictions that others have made based on their own interpretations of Q.

[RitaOK]

What did Q say about Trump Trump losing the election?

Q did say MIL was the only way, and the remark related to POTUS being safe or insulated onboard AF1 out of the country.

It was not fair to Q, but it was made easy for readers to extrapolate that something unsafe for POTUS was coming, and the Law of War citation made a lot of things sound possible that maybe are not?

I have no idea what’s true regarding Law of War, MIL and a president in between, Q didn’t say outright, a lot of things, but referenced a lot of sources that did.