Replies

“SADS, eh? Was she JABbed?

Sure, just like all the people dying of SADS back in 2007 because the Poison Jabs can time travel.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1955549/

Heart. 2007 May; 93(5): 547–548.

“Victims of sudden death from these diseases fall under the rubrick of sudden adult death syndrome (SADS), which has been coined to describe sudden death without a structural cause identified by autopsy or toxicological examination. Previous studies from the UK and the US estimated that >4% of sudden cardiac deaths fall into this category.

“Importantly, when screened, >20% of the first‐degree relatives of SADS victims are found to have some form of inherited arrhythmogenic disease. The demographics of SADS have not been well defined and there is a need for uniform terminology and data collection to understand better the importance of these diseases and how they might be better recognised.”

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Woman, 31, who went to gym and walked 10,000 steps a day dies suddenly in sleep, Pelham wrote:
“SADS, eh? Was she JABbed?
Sure, just like all the people dying of SADS back in 2007 because the Poison Jabs can time travel.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1955549/
Heart. 2007 May; 93(5): 547–548.
“Victims of sudden death from these diseases fall under the rubrick of sudden adult death syndrome (SADS), which has been coined to describe sudden death without a structural cause identified by autopsy or toxicological examination. Previous studies from the UK and the US estimated that >4% of sudden cardiac deaths fall into this category.
“Importantly, when screened, >20% of the first‐degree relatives of SADS victims are found to have some form of inherited arrhythmogenic disease. The demographics of SADS have not been well defined and there is a need for uniform terminology and data collection to understand better the importance of these diseases and how they might be better recognised.”
*

Actually 2007 SADS was most likely a prior incident in which the NIH/CDC knowingly contributed to untimely deaths and therefore made up a name to cover their tracks to make it sound like the deaths were 'natural'.

But now the 'vaccinated' young are dying in never-seen-before numbers so they just hauled 'SADS' off the shelf and dusted it off, this time claiming death-by-jab was actually to be expected. No one believes the lies by the NIH or CDC about the supposedly 'safe and effective' Covid 'vaccine' anymore. Well, except trolls. Trolls tirelessly espouse the CDC and NIH 'vax-pushing' party line.

I can see that it’s very easy to “assume” VAX related.

However, just showing one year, 2007 doesn’t prove your point. Would you by chance have data 2007-2020. That way if there is an underlying baseline you would be able to CLEARLY see if there is a baseline increase and does it coincide with VAX.

Cherry Picking one year is no better than making a fast assumption of Vax related.