I actually did. The point of the article is to criminalize whatever deviates from the approved narrative. In short, to silence the truth. Remember, Hunter’s laptop was a Russian propaganda, until it was not.
Try again. Nothing in the article deigns to criminalize speech. However, it does point out recurring patterns in the postings of Russian trolls.
I’ve noted the same things myself:
When you weigh in on a post with an opinion or facts that counter the troll’s designated narrative their two most favored tactics to distract you are these:
1. On off topic response typically coupled with confrontational questions whose intent is to get you arguing about anything other than the topic on hand.
2. The irrational insults. As we see above the trolls like to use unprovoked insults to get you off topic. Sometimes the insult is little more than drive-by provocation, sometimes it’s an insult designed just for you especially if the troll reads your home page and finds a soft spot they can poke at.