Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: David Treibs

At the outset of the effort that led to our constitution, most of the cannon were either owned by private citizens, were common property of the various militias or were stolen from the crown. Hell yes, the 2nd Amendment means cannon, tanks, bombers, the whole works.


25 posted on 06/03/2022 6:29:56 PM PDT by Lion Den Dan ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lion Den Dan

Thats right. ‘Arms’ means any weapons of war. No restrictions if you can afford it and maintain it. And ‘well regulated’ means you know how to use them.


28 posted on 06/03/2022 6:34:22 PM PDT by bakeneko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Lion Den Dan

If it’s good enough for the federale gov then it’s good enough for the citizens - the founding fathers warned against a standing army, and forbid the feds for infringing on arms. If it can be used in war for offense or defense, it’s an arm.
Don’t let the leftard/commies derail the conversation. If it’s an arm, they are forbidden from infringing on our having or using said arms.


38 posted on 06/03/2022 6:48:36 PM PDT by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson