That’s from an Indiana court that got it wrong.
Courts often get it wrong.
“That’s from an Indiana court that got it wrong. Courts often get it wrong.”
Sure! Courts are wrong all the time, and the subsequent Court that gets it right, can pen a cogent argument about where the first court went wrong.
YOU CAN NOT. All you can do, is repeat the same ridiculous arguments again, as if repetition improves them. But all you are doing is the same thing that got you frog-marched out of court the first time, which is, and I quote, and you did it above too, “they primarily rely instead on an eighteenth century treatise and quotations of Members of Congress made during the nineteenth century.”
All, once again while “The Plaintiffs do not mention the above United States Supreme Court authority in their complaint or brief.”
You see, ignoring the USSCt case that is directly on point, while regurgitating a bunch of crap that was written BEFORE the USSCt decision is what one would expect of a 4th Grader, or a graduate of a HBCU. I fully expect you to blurt out, “But yo Honor, dey dun got dis ‘tuff wrong!” - while never addressing what it is that they supposedly got wrong.
I am not exaggerating. That is how cringe-worthy your arguments are. Did you take debate here, at dis, THIS school??? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmO-ziHU_D8&t=114s
No, that is not from The Babylon Bee. That is real.