To: philman_36
LOL, you copied where I asked you, and then said I never asked you.
OK, you do not want to answer whether you are a Sovereign Citizen. FWIW I am neither a Sovereign Citizen nor a Birther.
Let’s try something new! What does the WKA court say, or present as the legal basis, are the requirements to be a NBC?
172 posted on
06/05/2022 12:12:37 PM PDT by
Penelope Dreadful
(And there is Pansies, that's for Thoughts.)
To: Penelope Dreadful
What does the WKA court say, or present as the legal basis, are the requirements to be a NBC?Why do you keep asking questions others do do your lifting?
Present it yourself.
174 posted on
06/05/2022 1:17:06 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Penelope Dreadful
Some more words for you...
Civil Rights Act of 1866The Civil Rights Act of 1866 declared all persons born in the United States to be citizens, "without distinction of race
or color, or
previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude." Although President Andrew Johnson vetoed the legislation, that veto was overturned by the 39th United States Congress and the bill became law. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was the nation's first civil rights law.[1]
Civil Rights Act of 1866
It was mainly intended, in the wake of the American Civil War, to protect the civil rights of persons of African descent born in or brought to the United States.[2]
Snip...The act had three primary objectives for the integration of African Americans into the American society following the Civil War: 1.) a definition of American citizenship 2.) the rights which come with this citizenship and 3.) the unlawfulness to deprive any person of citizenship rights "on the basis of race, color, or prior condition of slavery or involuntary servitude"[3] The act accomplished these three primary objectives.[3]
There's your "all people".
176 posted on
06/05/2022 1:57:01 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Penelope Dreadful
The 14th Amendment wasn't for those to come,
it was meant for those people there...
then.
They were former African slaves and others as shown above.
And you believe that something that applies to former
slaves applies to a Chinese man who was never a slave?
177 posted on
06/05/2022 2:42:23 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Penelope Dreadful
Let’s try something new!Indeed. Here ya go, @boy.
As you said...words have meanings.
Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3:
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.That also shows that the 14th governed the people in
that time, not in perpetuity.
Shall have. Past tense, not present or future tense.
179 posted on
06/05/2022 3:05:59 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson