I do believe that you have read the case. I am
simply asking you why you think the case was NOT about NBC, when the term was defined over and over by them.
I am asking you to explain your reasoning, why you then think that the case mentioned it so often, and I am asking you to explain what you thought they “decided wrongly.”
Are you unable to explain your reasoning??? Frankly, if you are not able to explain your reasoning, I would not be surprised.
That's not what you were spouting yesterday.
It is all there for you to read, in great detail.
Between the majority of the Court and the minority of the Court. Try reading that.
1) Sincere, but severely reading impaired;
blah blah bah blah blah. Read Wong Kimm Ark.
You can DAMN WELL come up with an apology!
I guess you haven't been on this thread and have not
read a single reply of mine else you would not have to ask that question.
Did you forget this reply of mine already?
62
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866, and ratified July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment extended liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved people.
I've explained my reasoning in that reply and others.
You just don't want to hear it.