Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36

“That is what I have been saying all along, that Wong Kim Ark is good law.
Yet you’re using it as precedent, not good law.”

Huh??? Have you started drinking already???


137 posted on 06/05/2022 9:15:53 AM PDT by Penelope Dreadful (And there is Pansies, that's for Thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: Penelope Dreadful
Huh???

Isn't Wong Kim Ark being used as precedent in Arkeny?

Have you started drinking already???

No, but it appears to be that you have.

You’re using Wong Kim Ark as precedent, not good law, when you throw out Arkeny.
Wong Kim Ark has a decision that has nothing to do with NBC.
Arkeny relies on a case that has nothing to do with NBC and you tout it. Got it.

140 posted on 06/05/2022 9:35:13 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson