Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Americannae1362
"You don’t win elections that way- and the scale of necessary cheating would be obvious to any Mr. And Mrs. Six-Pack, who robotically vote Democrat."

You are still assuming they plan to work within a Constitutional boundary, that protects private property. Try again. The dim ones, are already beating the drum for confiscation of houses, "for the homeless." I recall the rationale as "Property is theft."

Tell you you believe Democrats aren't Communists.

26 posted on 05/29/2022 10:43:48 PM PDT by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: jonascord

I read a blurb a couple of days ago that told of a female Democrat in Boston (I think it was Boston) that said anyone who is homeless should be able to just break in to any “abandoned” home and make it their own. She was referring to those “second homes” that some people own but don’t live in it, like a vacation home or maybe ones that they bought to flip or something, I don’t know. What do you consider “abandoned”? The whole idea is telling people to just steal someone’s property.


45 posted on 05/30/2022 6:48:03 AM PDT by JoJo354 (Freedom first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson