Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: T.B. Yoits

“These cruise lines illegally forced their employees to take the Jim Jones Jab or be fired.”

What law was broken?


11 posted on 05/29/2022 1:25:02 PM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator
“These cruise lines illegally forced their employees to take the Jim Jones Jab or be fired.”

What law was broken?

What law was broken when Nazi doctors experimented on those they deemed undesirables? Just because no law was broken doesn't mean what was done, and what was demanded was right.

14 posted on 05/29/2022 1:42:43 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (In time of peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGator
What law was broken?

Forcing experimental treatment on individuals was specifically addressed in the permissible experiments section of the Nuremberg Code in 1947. (http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/)

"The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:"

"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision."

"The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity."

"The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury."

"Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death."

"The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment."

"During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible."

The Nuremberg Kodex and the Declaration of Helsinki formed the basis for the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 45 Part 46.

31 posted on 05/29/2022 10:05:47 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson