Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cathi

“The qualifier “pro-Russian” suggests that Russia was a party to the conflict, which was not the case”

Fourth sentence says Russia was not a party to the conflict?

Say what? I stopped reading right there. Totally garbage article. I guess the Russian tanks and Little Green men didn’t really exist. Wow.


6 posted on 05/22/2022 1:23:14 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas (Ukraine published documents reportedly from Russia's 1st Tank Army showing its losses through March )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SpeedyInTexas

You might want to read more carefully. Of course their tanks and everything else were Russian. That’s the only brand of equipment anyone has in that neck of the woods. Defections from the Uke regime put that equipment in the hands of the pro-Russia side. Obviously Russia is helping them plenty now, but not much help was available when they were being shelled by nazis.


10 posted on 05/22/2022 1:31:31 PM PDT by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SpeedyInTexas
Fourth sentence says Russia was not a party to the conflict?

Say what? I stopped reading right there.


The conflict the article was referring to at that point was the referendums up for vote in Ukraine itself, long before the invasion.
108 posted on 05/22/2022 9:41:38 PM PDT by fr_freak ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson