Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

I think the Roe vs Wade decision is a good compromise. 1st trimester = have abortion if you want, 2nd trimester = must consult with others before deciding to abort, 3rd trimester = can’t have abortion.

However, that “good compromise” shouldn’t be dictated by the Supreme Court or a federal law. The most constitutional way to handle the abortion issue is to let each state make its own abortion policy.

If each state implemented Row vs Wade I think that would be good.


19 posted on 05/05/2022 6:09:50 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cymbeline

“I think the Roe vs Wade decision is a good compromise. 1st trimester = have abortion if you want, 2nd trimester = must consult with others before deciding to abort, 3rd trimester = can’t have abortion.”

I, and I think many other Freepers, would love to see your logical explanation of why getting an abortion in the first trimester is different than getting one in the third trimester. And who are these “others” you must consult for the 2nd trimester?


20 posted on 05/05/2022 6:28:09 AM PDT by suthener ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson