It is clearly obstruction of justice, under the U.S. Code, to send protesters to federal judges’ homes to attempt to influence their decisions on pending cases.
It is also very dangerous — even deadly — to reveal the home addresses of federal judges.https://t.co/qcg6St1zOW— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) May 5, 2022
Again, the Supreme Court must issue its opinion in Dobbs immediately.
With concurring and dissenting opinions to follow.
Giving out the home addresses of federal judges is very dangerous — even deadly:https://t.co/QNtmR52JjI— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) May 4, 2022
In September, the Biden Justice Department failed to prosecute protesters who harassed and intimidated Justice Kavanaugh, his wife, and young kids at their home.
The Biden Justice Department’s amnesty led to protesters threatening to harass and intimidate Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife at their home in March.
The First Amendment isn’t absolute.
There are time, place, and manner restrictions.
Narrowly tailored laws to protect federal judges from intimidation at their homes on pending cases are clearly constitutional.
The Due Process rights of the parties before the Court prevail.
Or just about anywhere else.
Just not their homes.