Replies

*NATO said they would not expand after the fall of the Berlin wall, and they lied

*NATO bombed Serbia because Serbia was fighting off radical muslims and NATO needs to protect radical Muslims so they can overrun Europe and replace the native population

*NATO kept adding nations on the borders of Russia and filling them with offensive weapons aimed at Russia

*The CIA toppled the elected governments of Ukraine and Georgia with governments that would host offensive weapons aimed at Russia

*Our own government admitted just last month that we had various biolabs, as Tucker mentioned, in Ukraine and that they admitted it would be bad if Russia secured them (why is that unless we were doing something illegal, hmmm?)

*Also as soon as the legit Ukraine government was overthrown in 2014 we had the entire Democratic party sending “officials” over there, and in the 2020 election we had the Ukraine ambassador announce that Donald Trump should not be re-elected as President

So yeah sorry not sorry I am not some mindless slob who will fall for your neocon propaganda, you guys over there at Langley and the Guardian need to do better because your historical revisionism doesn’t work anymore

Despite your preference for propaganda, even some actual history utterly fails to make your case that NATO is a threat to a peaceful Russia, and it remains that you are supporting an anti-Christ dictator who is the real threat to peaceful nations, as is supporting the Left in this country, while opposing the latter cannot justify supporting the former.

Now answer the questions I asked you.