Is it true that members of the public who attended a public meeting were forced to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) ?
Or was that just those members of the City Council who attended a closed session meeting to discuss spending taxpayer funds to inject itself into a private real estate transaction??
So many questions to play out this week. Look for all “evil” to surface in protesting Adventure Church this Sunday as word travels about this transaction.
More to follow.
To me this a blatant abuse of eminent domain and worse because there is obvious political motivations simply to prevent an already contracted buyer from completing their purchase, becuase the elected politicians that voted to take the eminent domain step simply don’t like that buyer.
The church needs support to take their case all the way to SCOTUS.