We're talking about the suspension of the Constitution for a long period, perhaps years. What would America under military rule look like? How would people's lives change? Having tasted power, would the military even want to give up rule? History doesn't have a great track record on that one.
In stating the question, I realize I sound like so-called "revolutionary vanguards" throughout history. Lenin, Hitler, Mao and others thought they could rule better than the people. Monarchs throughout history thought the same.
Chapter 2 of Decision in Philadelphia: The Constitutional Convention of 1787 by Christopher Collier and James Lincoln Collier lays out the socio-economic conditions of 1787 America. We look little like the nation that fought for its independence and wrote the Constitution. We've become more like the Europe our ancestors fled.
There is a line from the Vietnam War that echoes: "We had to destroy the village in order to save it." Are we talking about the same thing here? What will be the long-term consequences?
the question you’re asking...is whether or not Fed.gov exists to serve THESE United States.....or do THE United States exist to service Fed.gov......
With a leader such as Donald Trump, the American people will be fine under self government..This is how it should be. From what I understand of Kash Patels Devolution, military command would last only as long as it took to begin elections once again. Unless it lasted for years on end, I do not see the Generals unable to release control, they would come in only to return power to the people.
In stating the question, I realize I sound like so-called "revolutionary vanguards" throughout history. Lenin, Hitler, Mao and others thought they could rule better than the people. Monarchs throughout history thought the same.
I agree, however, I think President Trump is in this for the long haul, I think we will be led by him, and I do not think he is an Oligarch.
Chapter 2 of Decision in Philadelphia: The Constitutional Convention of 1787 by Christopher Collier and James Lincoln Collier lays out the socio-economic conditions of 1787 America. We look little like the nation that fought for its independence and wrote the Constitution. We've become more like the Europe our ancestors fled.
I agree and disagree. “We” are not all awake, true enough, but there is a faction that is, and rejects the concept of a ruler.
There is a line from the Vietnam War that echoes: "We had to destroy the village in order to save it." Are we talking about the same thing here? What will be the long-term consequences?
I don’t know. This is a whole other subject. I do know that we are gonna go through a bunch of stuff to wake us up…according to Q.
I don’t see military rule for very long at all. Also I don’t see suspension of Constitution at all; unless you mean a short military intervention; if that happens in a manner with military rule.
People don’t rule. They vote for leaders. People “ruling” is mob rule, which is not only rotten, but always seems to usher in tyranny.
Q had a plan, and I think it is still in play, still working, and before the midterms we will see some serious action that will dispell all doubts as to what is happening.
no matter what direction, they all are scary...
but things can not remain as they are....many of us will be crucified economically, socially, etc.....we don't stand a chance...
and if we don't stand a chance, our kids and grand kids don't either....
between basically a mafia govt and a military govt, I'd go with the military....for now....
Agreed. 21st Century Americans bear no resemblance to the "Moral and religious" people for whom the Constitution was designed.