Put up or shut up. If you can’t do the math to show how it works, you are just another BS artist.
If you compare the energy needed to get the hydrogen even in a perfect system it would just equal the energy you get from burning it. Meaning even if you had a non-existent perfect system it wouldn’t work.
You need a power source to begin with anytime you are dealing with hydrogen. Fossil fuels and nuclear plants are great because you get vastly more energy out than you have to put in. Solar and wind by comparison barely break even. In reality, both are unworkable without a massive amount of power provided by nukes or burning fossil fuels.
But hydrogen, forget about it. Anytime someone like you brings up hydrogen for powering cars I know they have no idea what they are talking about.
“Put up or shut up.”
I will do neither as you wouldn’t understand the manipulation of longitudinal energy. It’s old-school Tesla that’s pretty much been forbidden by main stream science and knocks Einsteins as well as Newtons Laws in the dirt.
What you should be asking is: Why would the scientific community at large ignore Tesla’s teachings? After all, our electrical grid (among other things) are a direct result of Tesla.