Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ultra-light liquid hydrogen tanks promise to make jet fuel obsolete
www.newatlas.com ^ | April 21, 2022 | Loz Blain

Posted on 04/21/2022 2:39:28 PM PDT by Jonty30

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-155 next last
To: T.B. Yoits

“Very light hydrogen worked so well in the Hindenburg”

It works great as long is you keep it away from oxygen and static electricity


61 posted on 04/21/2022 3:25:21 PM PDT by dsrtsage ( Complexity is just simple lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Liquid hydrogen. Kind of like Hindenburg in a can.


62 posted on 04/21/2022 3:26:12 PM PDT by Flick Lives (The CDC. Brought to you by Pfizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

The lighter the car, the longer it will take to stop.


63 posted on 04/21/2022 3:28:06 PM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Water and electricity. The electricity can be from any source, but preferably the sun, hydroelectric, or wind.

https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-production-processes


64 posted on 04/21/2022 3:28:10 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Born in 1950

We’re not getting any hydrogen? Why not?


65 posted on 04/21/2022 3:28:28 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
They should use helium instead of hydrogen to reduce the risk of fire.

Now that right there is funny, no matter who you are.

66 posted on 04/21/2022 3:32:51 PM PDT by itsahoot (Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

And don’t coat your ship in rocket fuel!🤔


67 posted on 04/21/2022 3:34:33 PM PDT by BiteYourSelf ( Earth first we'll strip mine the other planets later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Wont’ we run out of water if we take the hydrogen out of it? The oceans will dry up.


68 posted on 04/21/2022 3:35:59 PM PDT by oldasrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doc11355

So potentially are batteries and capacitors.

Energy be Energy.

Don’t EVER try to disobey the Laws of Physics [and Chemistry].

Science doesn’t have multiple tiers of Justice.


69 posted on 04/21/2022 3:40:37 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doc11355
a tank of hydrogen can also be described as a potential bomb.

Hint, so can gasoline.

70 posted on 04/21/2022 3:43:13 PM PDT by itsahoot (Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

There’s also ongoing research on solar-direct-to-hydrogen, skipping the “electricity” middleman.


71 posted on 04/21/2022 3:44:12 PM PDT by Campion (All we are saying is give peace a chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks

Surely you can’t be serious.


72 posted on 04/21/2022 3:45:54 PM PDT by Campion (All we are saying is give peace a chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

If you spill some liquid hydrogen on some asphalt the best thing you can do is step on it.


73 posted on 04/21/2022 3:46:45 PM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion

“Catalysts can change the kinetics (rate) of a reaction, but they can’t change the thermodynamics.”

Thanks for reminding me, it’s been awhile since I’ve taken those courses back in college. Energy input will be higher than energy output as long as mass is conserved, but I was attempting to imagine some sort of catalytic reaction which would initiate the loss of some mass during separation that could be used to drive the reaction forward beyond what the energy inputted would do, thus some of the mass being converted into energy like what happens in a fusion reaction, something that probably isn’t possible according to current science. Oh well.


74 posted on 04/21/2022 3:50:54 PM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jimwatx
It’s combustible, so it’s a fuel itself.

The reason why I said what I did is because of HOW you get Hydrogen. You don't mine it, you don't drill for it, you don't harvest it, you manufacture it either from electrolysis of water or the steam-methane reforming process of Natural Gas.

Thus, Hydrogen is in and of itself not a fuel source, it is an energy storage medium created from another energy source.

75 posted on 04/21/2022 3:55:26 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

We will wait a couple of decades before trying this!

https://www.history.com/news/the-hindenburg-disaster-9-surprising-facts


76 posted on 04/21/2022 3:56:32 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Anyone, who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.!" ~ (Voltaire)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
But the economics seem to work for UPS, a lot of their “last mile” trucks now are nat gas, with on-site fueling at their depots.

When I lived in Palm Springs the entire Sun Bus line was running on Natural Gas, they also would install conversion kits on your car for a couple grand twenty years ago.

77 posted on 04/21/2022 3:57:24 PM PDT by itsahoot (Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Isn’t today’s “science” mostly BS? It’s what you get when you start from false premises.

1) Whatever you do to generate Hydrogen, it won’t be “clean”.

2) Unless you’re going to lug around pure Oxygen, too, any reaction you try with “air” won’t be “clean”, either.

The planes will probably just finally destroy the Ozone layer for good. We can all die of skin cancer, but at least we’ll feel “clean”.


78 posted on 04/21/2022 4:00:20 PM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

F=[mu]N

It’s all the same as long as the brakes can develop sufficient torque to take advantage of the tires’ friction. [to the first order of analysis]


79 posted on 04/21/2022 4:04:09 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

The Sun has a lot of Hydrogen.

Why not just mine it there?


80 posted on 04/21/2022 4:05:18 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson