Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man
No - I'm much more concerned about minimizing the number of people who die moving forward, and criminal liability for honest errors is not going to accomplish that.

Suing and suspending or revoking licenses are the appropriate remedies.

36 posted on 04/08/2022 7:48:52 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Bruce Campbells Chin

You aren’t the one who determines what an “honest” error is.

You cannot know if its honest or not. Just because something isn’t deliberate doesn’t automatically or magically make it HONEST. that is completely ridiculous when it comes to talking about an error or series of errors that kills someone.

They could be careless and rushing around. Not doing due diligence. Being tired or overworked does not somehow make it an HONEST error. That is not an HONEST error in my opinion. And it should be decided in court when people die from these kinds of errors.

That term is idiotic. Like it absolves them because they can’t be tagged because they are touching the safe tree. The courts can decide if its an honest error or not. The dead person/people can’t tell anyone whether they’re ok with it or not.


37 posted on 04/08/2022 8:03:24 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson