[Steve Van Doorn]

The vaccines where not mRNA they where actually microRNA or much more edited then we previously thought. For example they used three GP120 gene which is the surface of the HIV envelope.

As far as AZD1222 being pulled. I was simply saying they where the AstraZeneca vaccines made in Australia.

[absalom01]

 The vaccines where not mRNA they where actually microRNA or much more edited then we previously thought. For example they used three GP120 gene which is the surface of the HIV envelope.

 

Now I'm even more confused.  Keep in mind I'm having to google the intel you're providing to even wrap my head around it.  So you're saying that someone has figured out that the mRNA or miRNA includes a total of three copies of the gene that codes for the HIV capsid Glycoprotein GP120?  Is this similar to Luc Montagnier's early notes about finding similarities to the HIV genome in the RNA of the CCP virus?  Or is that a different matter altogether?

Even more mind-bending is that it was my understanding that micro RNA didn't actually code for a protien, but had something to do with gene expression, which is as far as my undergraduate biology class and my aging brain can remember.

You had previously warned that one of the vaccines (i can't remember which one) contained a gene to code for an antigen expressed by the malaria plasmodium parasite (at least that how I understood it).  Is this another part of this same thing?  Or is it an issue of contamination with actual antigens, on top of including genes that code for different proteins?