What I think should be done is quite different than “what should be done”. Because I think that, since the agreement is void, we should just help them build some nukes, by huk or by cruk. If they had kept those nukes, there would have been no invasions.
But “what should be done” implies that others would have input into the response, which means here come the politicians with their mumblypeg responses and bullshiite along with the putinista pantywaist brigade. They are BARELY willing to allow us to provide weapons, like we did when Russia invaded and tried to annex Afghanistan.
“what I think should be done is quite different than “what should be done”.” is a quite convenient dodge from my question.
A totally mumbly bullshiite (to use your terms) response.