Yeah, this was a stretch talking to you about respondent biases in polling is a little beyond your capabilities. Nor can you wrap your head around that an NGO think tank funded by the same foundation that funds the Clinton Global Initiative would shade their results. But look, the most important thing is for you to speak your own truth and feel good about yourself. Kamala is proud of you, no doubt.
Yeah, this was a stretch talking to you about respondent biases in polling is a little beyond your capabilities.
***Nonsense. I know how to detect bias. From my home page:
___________________________________________________________________
How to Measure Media Bias on a Regular Basis?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2181363/posts
———————___________________________________________________________________
You just have to PROVE that there is as much bias as you say there is. You have zero proof, you’re just asserting there’s so much bias that the poll is worthless. And on top of that, you have NO other poll to look at in its stead. It is a classic case of arguing from silence.
Nor can you wrap your head around that an NGO think tank funded by the same foundation that funds the Clinton Global Initiative would shade their results.
***You’re completely full of shiite. There are times when an organization needs to know what people want, one way or the other, no bias or nonsense necessary. You seem utterly incapable of perceiving this.
But look, the most important thing is for you to speak your own truth and feel good about yourself.
***Pot, look at the kettle. But you add classic fallacies to your perspective, so you are worth less than zero.
Kamala is proud of you, no doubt.
***Your teacher will flunk you when you take that critical thinking class, no doubt.