Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
For greater enjoyment of Democratic Initiatives Foundation polls, funded by an NGO with direct connections to the Clinton Global Initiative, for the benefit of a very troubled person who thinks he has conservative qualities:

USAID sponsored other implementing agencies actively supporting democratic consolidation in Ukraine, working directly with NDI, IRI, Freedom House, InterNews, and ABA/CEELI. The work of these groups in tandem with local activists and grassroots groups helped meet the demand of millions of Ukrainians for enhanced democracy and improved governance. Numerous international institutions also deserve commendation. Those involved in efforts complementary to SEAUP were: the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), Project Coordinator Office in Ukraine, the Election Law Institute, the Razumkov Center, the Democratic Initiatives Foundation, and the Agency for Legislative Initiatives (ALI). SEAUP worked closely with the OSCE in promoting the professionalism of Ukraine’s relatively inexperienced election commissioners.

https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADE309.pdf (Celebrating the most obvious coups in the history of coups)

* * *

USAID Chair Samantha Power joined the Obama State Department transition team in late November 2008. She served as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights on the National Security Council from January 2009 to February 2013.

***

Democratic Initiatives Foundation $80,000 Kyiv, Ukraine To promote free and fair elections in Ukraine. - Charles Stewart MOTT FOUNDATION Annual Report 1999

Special Projects Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation New York, NY $20,000 – 12 mos. Clinton Global Initiative

- MOTT FOUNDATION Annual Report 2016

* * *

This grant will provide general purposes support to the William J. Clinton Foundation, a public charity established in 1997 by the 42nd President of the United States. The mission of the organization is to strengthen the capacity of people throughout the world to meet the challenges of global interdependence. To advance this mission, the foundation operates a number of domestic and international programs, including the Alliance for a Healthier Generation, the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative, the Clinton Climate Initiative, the Clinton Global Initiative, and the Urban Enterprise Initiative. The foundation works principally through partnerships with like-minded individuals, organizations, corporations, and governments, often serving as an incubator for new policies and programs.

Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Website.

***

USAID Ukrain RFP, with propaganda instructions embedded within it.

https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1863/REVISED_RFP_72012120R00003.pdf

***

So, to answer my rhetorical question "How close is the the Democratic Initiatives Foundation to the Clinton Global Initiative?" This Ukranian Think Tank is directly connected to the Clinton Global Initiative through the US Department of State and its servient NGO's. But, Kevmo, like nearly all of what you have posed in response to my comments, you fail to sense propaganda when it is right under your nose. So keep on pulling for an escalation in Ukraine and TTFN.

117 posted on 03/08/2022 6:20:17 AM PST by frithguild (The warmth and goodness of Gaia is a nuclear reactor in the Earth's core that burns Thorium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: frithguild

Dude. Guess who was prez in 1994 when the Ukes, the US, and the Russians got together and dismantled Ukraine’s Nukes? Bill Clinton. Just because there’s a CONNECTION doesn’t mean it’s ONLY a propaganda machine.

Why is it so difficult for you to believe there’s an organization that wants democracy for the Ukraine? It’s no different than an organization that would want democracy for Namibia. So let’s say this Namibian democracy organization wants to find out just how many people want democracy versus straightforward strongman politics. And they find that it’s 69%. How would such numbers be tainted? They want to KNOW. And more to the point, when they come up with their result and publish it at 69%, for YOU to refute it means you gotta have more reliable results and better information, which YOU DO NOT HAVE. So you throw darts, from your SILENCE of information. It is called arguing from silence for a reason — because your information source is SILENT. It is a classic fallacy. Until you come up with more-than-silent INFORMATION, you are simply arguing from silence. Sour grapes be damned.


118 posted on 03/08/2022 6:42:51 AM PST by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson