Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: WMarshal

That things toast. I just read that it was the ONLY AN-225. Sad. Destroying that plane accomplished nothing.


12 posted on 02/27/2022 6:22:34 PM PST by know.your.why (If you dont watch the MSM you are uninformed. If you do watch the MSM you are misinformed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: know.your.why

Pretty risky to build just one of something.

Look at how the production volume of the B-52 has helped to extend its active design life.


15 posted on 02/27/2022 6:25:30 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: know.your.why

Wikipedia says there’s a partially built airframe somewhere in storage and the engines are common with an airliner (188 built) so maybe they can cobble a replacement together.


17 posted on 02/27/2022 6:27:12 PM PST by nascarnation (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: know.your.why
"That things toast. I just read that it was the ONLY AN-225. Sad. Destroying that plane accomplished nothing."

It is sad. We may never know if the plane was targeted deliberately or if its destruction was just a consequence of taking out the airport as an military asset.

The typical psychopaths that rule humanity and the destruction they cause are disgusting. War is waste.

27 posted on 02/27/2022 6:39:30 PM PST by WMarshal ("No war for communism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson