I find it amazing that the legal jostling between The Mann of the State Penn and Mark Steyn is nowhere close to being adjudicated as of today [what? ~10 years after initiation and counting...].
Keeping Steyn quiet! They’d proceed if Steyn opened up again. Plus, it’s a nice slow-bleed tactic! This tactic needs to be made illegal!!
“. . . legal jostling between The Mann of the State Penn and Mark Steyn is nowhere close to being adjudicated . . .”
A clear indication that the case in question has almost nothing to do with science or even law - it’s simply a case of ‘law fare’: pursue endless litigation in an attempt to impoverish your adversary for their impertinence in opposing your viewpoint.
My guess is Mann is backed by deep-pocketed Soros-types (if not that scumbag himself); not sure how Steyn keeps his financial head above water.