There is no analysis in that article. Any who has written analysis papers can quickly see it is nothing but opinion and arguments through assertions.
In other words, propaganda. Statements like “There is no doubt that climate change will define our futures, regardĀless of actions taken in the coming years; “ are not analysis and if an analyst were to write anything like that it would get thrown back in their face.
The best way to read articles like these is to replace “climate change” with “Unicorns”.
So—
“There is no doubt that Unicorns will define our futures, regardĀless of actions taken in the coming years.”
Nope. A series of accusations is not analysis. Of course, it's racist to point that out.