Rumble.com ^ | February 17, 2022 | Son of Enos
Posted on 2/19/2022, 4:22:46 PM by E. Pluribus Unum
Australian police have been deploying directed energy weapons (DEWs) against the peaceful Freedom Convoy protesters around the capital, according to reports.
Disturbing videos and photos circulating social media show Canberra protesters, including women and children, who appear to have been badly burned by directed microwave energy weapons, with blisters on their faces, arms, and torsos.
Great catch lucy!!
LucyT wrote:
“
Shock Report: Microwave Energy Weapons Deployed Against Canberra Freedom Convoy
Rumble.com ^ | February 17, 2022 | Son of Enos
Posted on 2/19/2022, 4:22:46 PM by E. Pluribus Unum
Australian police have been deploying directed energy weapons (DEWs) against the peaceful Freedom Convoy protesters around the capital, according to reports.
Disturbing videos and photos circulating social media show Canberra protesters, including women and children, who appear to have been badly burned by directed microwave energy weapons, with blisters on their faces, arms, and torsos.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4039809/posts
“
ThankQ for the info.
Some interesting posts between conservative mind and Travis mcgee on that thread.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4039809/posts
conservative mind is technical and explains the amount and type of energy being received:
Pic of truck posted by Travis:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4039809/posts?page=80#80
Reply by conservative mind:
“It’s LRAD, the sonic/acoustic weapon:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4039809/posts?page=81#81
Reply by Travis:
“
Note the dial is on the highest setting. The guys monitoring say it’s the highest they’ve ever seen, 20X limits for human exposure. This is NOT just a loud “acoustic weapon.”
“
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4039809/posts?page=91#91
Reply by conservative mind:
“
The dial is not on it’s its setting. It is strictly on “RF,” for “Radio Frequency.”
Notice it is also on “mW/m^2.” So we are seeing a peak of around 20, not 20,000. You see, according to the manufacturer, it is actually accurate to 0.001 mW/m^2. Now, England and Australia may not believe in the use of commas, but the manufacturer of the device did not make that period a replacement for a comma in the thousands position. See the manufacture’s website on the device:
Now, let’s go one step further.
The legal limit for RF power at cell phone frequencies is:
“9000 mW/m2 for 1800 MHz and 4,500 mW/m2 for 900 MHz (Look at the 1998 reference in the table)”
http://www.emfwise.com/emf-safety-standards.php
So what they appear to be catching is roughly 0.2% of that legal limit.
Now, I would much rather the power be a fraction of even that, but, unfortunately, I don’t know how we can determine such a low amount showing on a meter isn’t just from a hundred cell phones within a half block of the meter, do you?
Something to think about.
“
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4039809/posts?page=103#103