[ransomnote]

The New York Times writes another article about nothing. In this episode, Ron Watkins and Paul Furber (!) are the end result of exotic hi-tech sleuthing which declares them to be the forces behind 'Q'. Never mind that the most cursory observation reveals neither man writes anything like Q, and all those Q proofs etc.

But of interest is why is the NYT telling us that Q is defunct and no one cares about him/them? I mean, if you have to keep telling people there's no 'there' there.....

This is posted on CIA central (IMGUR) and is composed a few images so you have to scroll down to read.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/19/technology/qanon-messages-authors.html

[numberonepal]

You know you’d think that when they make these wild accusations they would use the ONE Q post that might help their cause.

“Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here.”

It really means they have not studied the posts.

[meadsjn]

But of interest is why is the NYT telling us that Q is defunct and no one cares about him/them?

Perhaps the hanging of Epstein's partner inside the French jail has rattled some cages.