Forensic linguists say they now know the origin of the Q texts on the message board that began the QAnon movement
Linguists with the firm OrphAnalytics and École des Chartes both concluded that Paul Furber and Ron Watkins launched the movement
Furber, 55, a tech journalist from South Africa, did not deny the claim
Watkins, 34, who is running for Congress in Arizona, defended the movement but denied that he was Q
Furber and Watkins reportedly worked together until December 2017 and then Watkins took over
QAnon followers believe that high-powered Democrats run an international child sex ring out of a pizza shop
Many rioters on the Capitol on January 6 believed in the QAnon movement and thought that the 2020 election was stolen
By JANON FISHER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 00:16 EST, 20 February 2022 | UPDATED: 03:46 EST, 20 February 2022
One of the enduring mysteries of the Trump era - ‘who is Q’ - appears to be solved, sort of.
Two sets of forensic linguists have published two separate papers using two different techniques to conclude that Q appears to be two people: South African tech journalist Paul Furber, 55, and 4chan internet message board moderator and computer entrepreneur Ron Watkins, 34, according to the studies.
‘While relying on two completely different technologies, both stylometric [quantitative study of literary style] analyses could establish that QAnon’s early period on the 4chan forum, from October to December 2017, was likely the result of a collaboration between Paul Furber and Ron Watkins,’ according to Claude-Alain Roten, the CEO of OrphAnalytics.
Roten, who worked with Lionel Pousaz, a partner at OrphAnalytics, took the writings of several people identified as potential Q originators and analyzed writings they had authored then cross-referenced it using computer software with early QAnon posts.
‘Open your eyes. Many in our govt worship Satan,’ was the first post on October 2017 that launched the movement, according to The New York Times, which was given exclusive access to the linguistics studies.
When reached by the Times, Furber didn’t dispute that Q’s writing resembled his own, while Watkins, who is running for Congress in Arizona, told the NYT: ‘I am not Q.’
This debunks one theory that Q is a high-ranking military insider.
Read More:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4039932/posts
Propaganda, pure and simple. It’s what they do.
Funny as more and more things come to light regarding the DS, the more we are seeing articles debunking Q.
Gee, why all the attention on something that only idiots follow?