This, or anything remotely similar, should NOT be done as it serves to discourage rape victims from reporting their crimes. Just IMHO, of course.
Like the DNA in the China Virus 19 test kits being entered into data bases?
FR Thread not too long ago revealed that same test kit was used to identify a fugitive that fled the US to Scottland.
“This, or anything remotely similar, should NOT be done as it serves to discourage rape victims from reporting their crimes. Just IMHO, of course.”
Perhaps it might encourage them not to commit crimes.
Really neither one is here or there.
Can this DNA be used in such a way is the question.
“This, or anything remotely similar, should NOT be done as it serves to discourage rape victims from reporting their crimes.”
Hmmm. I get your argument but not sure I agree. Let’s say that a rape victim murdered someone in the past, is it better that that crime remain unsolved than the victim be discouraged from reporting her rape? I don’t know. And if she’s discouraged from coming forward simply because she anticipates that it will limit her ability to commit future crimes, is that really something that is so horrible that we should worry about it? Also, couldn’t the same thing be said of something like fingerprints? Like if the cops are investigating a crime scene and they need to distinguish the victim’s fingerprints from the perp’s, they might obtain the victim’s prints. Should they never do anything with that information?