I don’t recall commenting on how to embalm.
Although I’m aware of how it’s done, my comments were restricted to obtaining viable blood samples and postmortem examination.
Embalming is Not examination.
Perhaps even quite the opposite.
Mr. Hirschman is One person making outrageous claims.
What I find more amazing is the people that get behind one man that they don’t know who’s claims they can’t verify and Freepers that they have known in some cases for decades who are Doctors they bash, and diss.
Now that’s remarkable.
Lividity too. Which is the best chance on getting a sample blood draw for only for a short window.
Embalmers, Funeral Homes don’t get the bodies in that frame of time.
They also DO NOT do postmortem exams.
But we’ll keep those facts to ourselves. Let them carry on.
Your comment implied that the findings the embalmers reported would not be within their scope of practice when they actually would be in a uniquely experienced position to discuss post mortem clots. Post mortem = after death
This is not the only man making these claims and he isn’t just saying it.
I don’t “believe” his statements. They are grist for the mill. There is nothing disproving his statements but at this point it is anecdotal. Much like your cardiologist who has had 3 cases of myocarditis. For something to be rare a single physician will maybe not see a case in their lifetime.
Freepers that they have known in some cases for decades who are Doctors they bash, and diss.
_______________
While OTHER FReepers who are also MDS, recognize reality and they are NOT bashed or dissed.
“Appeal to authority” works both ways, no?
Also, a discussion board/forum is not composed of people who “know” each other, even after decades. We are simply words on a screen. When a “doctor” becomes an outlier and maintains they are not encountering the same documented & verified events as tens of thousands of others around the globe, they invite skepticism.