#Durham: New filing “Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s (Executive Office of the President) DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump” + alleges USG may seek to show defendant pic.twitter.com/fvM9s0v8N4— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) February 13, 2022
#Durham: New filing “Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s (Executive Office of the President) DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump” + alleges USG may seek to show defendant pic.twitter.com/fvM9s0v8N4— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) February 13, 2022
gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.35.0_2
note on page 11 ---> "On or about October 18, 2018, the then-Managing Partner of Law Firm-1 wrote a letter to the editor of a major newspaper in which he asserted, in part, “Mr. Sussmann’s meeting with the FBI General Counsel James Baker was on behalf of a client with no connections to either the Clinton campaign, the DNC or any other Political Law Group client.”"
Privilege logs and redacted emails obtained from Law Firm-1 in this investigation reflect that in the days before the issuance of these statements, Latham attorneys sent, received, and/or were copied on correspondence relating to the drafting and dissemination of the statements. (Much of the substance of those emails was redacted and withheld from the Special Counsel’s Office pursuant to Law Firm-1’s assertion of attorney-client privilege and attorney work product protections)."Because the defendant was aware of and/or reviewed these media statements, the Government may seek to offer them as evidence pursuant to Rule 404(b) or other provisions of law to establish that the defendant sought to conceal the Clinton Campaign’s ties to the Russian Bank-1 allegations from the FBI and others."
