Posted on 02/12/2022 12:49:16 PM PST by ransomnote
Sometimes you can’t TELL the public the truth.
YOU MUST SHOW THEM.
ONLY THEN WILL PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4038998/posts?page=1
Accused Louisville Attempted Shooter Released From Jail With Help Of BLM Bail Fund
The Daily Caller ^ | 16Feb | Hutchison
Posted on 2/16/2022, 9:19:02 PM by qaz123
A local chapter of Black Lives Matter posted bail Wednesday for a left-wing activist accused of attempting to shoot a mayoral candidate, according to multiple local reports.
Quintez Brown faces multiple charges, including the alleged attempted murder of Craig Greenberg, a Democratic candidate for mayor, but the Louisville Community Bail Fund raised the funds to post his $100,000 bail, WLKY.com reported.
His halitosis must be absolutely monstrous.
Getting off grid, even if for emergency only, is a great accomplishment! Congrats!
wow! here’s an older forum thread on that!
“Pfizer was working with the FBI to retaliate against O’Keefe based on what the FBI told Judicial Watch in the FOIA request,
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4032330/posts?page=1
Everything You Learned Watching Cop Shows is Wrong
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fbi-keeps-pushing-junk-science-to-win-convictions
Excerpt:
And the FBI apparently wants you to stay ignorant. It makes their job easier.....
First up is the current story, about firearms forensics.
For years, forensic firearms analysts have claimed the ability to examine the marks on a bullet found at a crime scene and match it to the gun that fired it—to the exclusion of all other guns. It can be powerfully persuasive to juries. But over the last decade or so, some scientists have cast doubt on the claim.
Forensic firearms analysis falls into a subcategory of forensics colloquially known as “pattern matching.” In these specialties, an analyst looks at a piece of evidence from a crime scene and compares it with a piece of evidence associated with a suspect.
That claim, that they can match a bullet to a gun went unchallenged for a long time. When you actually test them their accuracy falls to about 50 percent. Less than 50 percent.
Carriquiry points to another recent sensitivity study—funded by the FBI itself—in which the analysts’ success rate was just 48 percent. “A dispassionate observer would say that they would have made fewer mistakes if they had flipped a coin,” Carriquiry says. “Given that astonishingly low accuracy, it seems pure hubris to be recommending to examiners to ‘push back.’”
It has been a long time coming, but the Justice System (so called) doesn’t want anything to upset the applecart of convictions, even if those convictions are based on a scam.
The first shot across the bow came in 2009, when the National Academy of Sciences published the first comprehensive, scientific review of forensics, which found that analysts routinely give testimony unsupported by scientific research, even though it’s often presented to and perceived by jurors as science.
In the wake of that study, the Obama administration created the National Commission on Forensic Sciences (NCFS), a large group of lawyers, scientists, judges, and statisticians tasked with identifying the shortcomings in forensic and prescribing solutions and best practices.
You can imagine how that went over. Click thru, there is a lot of detail on how the FBI, the DOJ, the National District Attorneys Association, and more want this to go away, so they can get back to convicting people. Don’t clutter the issue with facts.
This report on firearm forensics is not the first time that the Justice System has pushed junk science to convict people. Fire science wasn’t much of a science before the 1990s; before that it was wishful thinking. Scientific Advances in Arson Investigations Reveal Wrongful Convictions.
“A lot of bad science has been applied to arson investigation,” said fire expert John Lentini, who has provided testimony in over 40 arson cases since 2000. One of his recent cases involved a Massachusetts man, Victor Rosario, who was convicted of arson by Molotov cocktail even though no accelerant was found on any glass recovered at the crime scene.
Richard Roby, president and technical director of Combustion Science and Engineering, a fire protection engineering company based in Columbia, Maryland, has had similar experiences. “I shudder to think about how many wrongful convictions there are,” said Roby, who has testified for several defendants charged with arson. One, Michael Ledford, is serving a 50-year sentence for setting a fire that killed his son. According to Roby, however, Ledford could not have been present at the scene when the blaze was allegedly set. “It’s amazing to think how long it takes for basic science to be accepted,” he stated. “I lose sleep over this every week.”
Even fingerprints are not as infallible as the TV Shows would have you believe. Fingerprints Lack Scientific Basis for Legal Certainty.
“Everyone has distinctive fingerprints” is a statement that was accepted by the Justice System without any effort to see if it was actually correct. And if it could stand up to the limited 8-point analysis often used. But see, even asking the question means that they have to risk the answer being “No.” They would rather have wrongful convictions than see any Justice in the world.
A new American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) working group report on the quality of latent fingerprint analysis says that courtroom testimony and reports stating or even implying that fingerprints collected from a crime scene belong to a single person are indefensible and lack scientific foundation.
“Fingerprinting is one of the most heavily used forensic methods. Routinely, fingerprint analysts report and testify to ‘identification,’ that is, that the person who left the mark at the crime scene is the same person whose fingerprint is in the database, said Joseph B. (Jay) Kadane, Carnegie Mellon University’s Leonard J. Savage University Professor of Statistics and Social Sciences, Emeritus. “Our review of the scientific literature found that there is no scientific way to estimate the number of people in some community—a city, a state, the country, the world—who share the characteristics found, and hence no scientific basis for identification.”
None of this stops the Criminal Justice System from trying to WIN. It is what they value, because it is how they are rewarded. There are no rewards for Justice.
****
The only scientifically backed evidence tool currently used is DNA. The other so-called evidentiary tools used have, as this article outlines, never been scientifically validated. They are tools created by lawyers for lawyers, with inferences thrown in to make one believe they are science-based when they are not. Why would we be surprised given the current Covid garbage being pushed as science, when it isn’t.
TCB ⚡
FDA Executive Officer Exposes Close Ties Between Agency and Pharmaceutical Companies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay2_AY9uyOU
Green board?
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Part 2
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4039007/posts?page=1
You Will Never Guess Who’s in Charge of the $60 Million in Black Lives Matter Assets (Mark Elias!)
pjmedia.com ^ | rick moran
The PILLOWS are getting through...
Mike Lindell sending truckload of pillows to Freedom Convoy protesters in Ottawa
Trudeau can end the abuse by ending the mandates. Funny how he only sees this from his POV. He forgot that he works FOR US, so at this point, the little tyrant is doing it to himself.
Add me to that meme, please.
Only difference is the call: Triggers HOT.
LIVE Ottawa - RAW Footage: Freedom Convoy 2022 Day 20 - Emergency Act - Wednesday Feb 16 pt 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HsOGIsK6IA
B R, I went to the App Store, found the Truth Social app, it told me it would be ready on Feb 21(?) and, after I clicked the GET button, it told me it would show up and I would be notified by email when it was there. Yes, I had to give my email, but it’s not like the App Store doesn’t know me by now !
https://t.me/SergeantRobertHorton/1722
Evidence Emerges of War Crimes Committed in Canberra - Microwave Energy Weapon Used On Civilians
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.