No you should stop using BS. Yes inside the containment is radioactive and I would not walk in it. No the site is not so containmenated you cannot walk through it.
There are funds fully allocated to break down the dead unit and bury it. The TMI releases never amounted to anything that was any risk to the public. The material can be and is safely handled and can be safely stored. Problem is you are not interested in reality, your interested in playing a cut and paste warrior and do not even understand what you are cutting and pasting.
It is not clear at all whether or not I am allowed to continue to post in response on this kind of latent-protection thread.
No you should stop using BS.
***I think YOU’re the one spreading BS around here.
Yes inside the containment is radioactive and I would not walk in it.
***And at this point in time, Amerika has no program in place for permanent disposal of nuke waste. After 7 decades of playing around with it. Once we count the cost of disposal [including the 3 accident sites of TMI, Chernobyl, and Fukushima] we will see Fission as a very expensive solution. It’s luzing ground even already, WITHOUT having a permanent program in place, due to the low cost of natural gas.
No the site is not so containmenated you cannot walk through it.
***Feel free, especially through that zone you just said you WOULDN’T walk through.
There are funds fully allocated
***That’s some serious bs right there. It is at best PARTIALLY allocated because we still don’t KNOW the final cost of permanent disposal of nuke waste.
to break down the dead unit and bury it.
***You’d be a billionaire if you had such a solution.
The TMI releases never amounted to anything that was any risk to the public.
***Not the subject of discussion, so it’s essentially a whataboutism. I agree with the fact behind it, but using it as an argument about nuke waste is a simple whataboutism.
The material can be and is safely handled and can be safely stored.
***SURE, it CAN be. But the Proper way to dispose of it is incredibly expensive at $10k/pound, which is to fly it into the sun. Other disposal plans are cheaper but far more expensive than the industry is willing to pay.
Problem is you are not interested in reality,
***Problem is that you are asserting solutions where they do not exist.
your interested in playing a cut and paste warrior
***If it’s so basic and generic then you can easily cut & paste these scientific assertions that you’re relying on. But you don’t because you can’t because there are no solutions to the problem.
and do not even understand what you are cutting and pasting.
***Feel free to post the cost projections of storing nuke waste at... say, Yucca Mountain... and why not underneath your own very house. We will all see that the nuke power industry [which was heavily subsidized since its inception] is not capable of paying that cost.