“You often see dualling autopsy reports “
NOT autopsies! Embalmers! In trying to insert embalming fluid into blood vessels they are finding them blocked, clogged, with clots and white rubbery substance.
“NOT autopsies! Embalmers!”
Yes, I understood. My point is that actual doctors tasked with determining the cause of death often disagree. They have much better tools and access to whatever health and vaccination records exist. I’d be shocked if an embalmer even had access to records, let alone the skill and background required to determine cause of death. Even taking her reports at face value, they would never be accepted as a cause of death. I hate the vaccines and I think there are financial motives and not medical motives behind the mandates. But whatever an embalmer says should not be acceptable as evidence either way.
Just to be a skeptic:
1. A large percent of work is don’t without embalming. Cremations are not embalmed.
2. This would be more meaningful with a much larger sample size.
3. This applies to dead people. What was the metric before? Is this something they keep track of?
4. Anecdotal evidence is the start of most research. But this is only anectdotal. It would be interesting to some kind of study on this.
Ok…I got that out of my system.