You have a very high opinion of yourself. Is this justified by any actual accomplishment on your part that you have not shared with the rest of us? It is revealing that even when someone tries to give a supportive and sincere pat on the back that you still react with vitriol. Is this just part of your nature or has it evolved over time from some sort of perceived abuse? Was there even one link that I provided in my previous post that you found distasteful in any way?
You have a very high opinion of yourself.
***What difference would that make one way or the other? You have an extremely high opinion of YOURself, saying that you see electrochemical interactions where the top 100 electrochemists of the day could not.
Is this justified by any actual accomplishment on your part that you have not shared with the rest of us?
***Is YOUR high opinion of YOURself justified with respect to the top experts in electrochemistry?
It is revealing that even when someone tries to give a supportive and sincere pat on the back that you still react with vitriol.
***I reacted to the sincerity with sincerity, seagulling with seagulling, fire with fire, line by line. When you throw seagulling into the mix of “sincere pat on the back” it’s like cooking an omelette with 5 good eggs and one bad egg.
Is this just part of your nature or
***False dilemma. Classic fallacy.
has it evolved over time from some sort of perceived abuse?
***You seem to have trouble with the line-by-line refutation and/or agreement of what you say. Has this character defect always been there or is it something you developed over time due to some perceived abuse?
Was there even one link that I provided in my previous post that you found distasteful in any way?
***I didn’t even look at the links. I did not find them distasteful. They struck me as kind of a footnote comment, so I ignored them. Why don’t you just go ahead and open a few of your own parallel LENR threads so you can express your scientifically based objections? Maybe it’ll go well for you.