Yawn
Surely you understand our betters' proven, repeated interests in wealth redistribution, population control and mass poisoning.
For this latter, various government-medical-and-big pharma-friendly media outlets have tried to "debunk" them. Reuters is typical of this. They broadly wave their verbs at a number of groups claiming how carcinogenic ethylene oxide and sodium azide that are noted on many PCR test labels are.
After implicitly mocking those with "Poison!" claims, Reuters asks the manufacturer for comment, whose PR and legal departments predictably assure a likely college-fresh journalism major from Reuters that EO is used only in sterilization and "lateral flow" assures no EO will remain on the product at the time of its intended use.
BOOM! Debunked, Reuters has said! (Now reconsider the mass poisoning link above.) Reuters' (Snopes', etc.) debunking rigor has no scientific rigor to it at all if, as it seems, it relies only on the manufacturer's word.
That millions of presumably intelligent citizens both are presented without further comment the above fallacious logical proof, similar to your concern over (the logic of) needlessly testing healthy people, I would call these weapons arrayed against us effective propaganda, or as has been noted elsewhere: mass psychosis.