Posted on 01/31/2022 5:00:56 AM PST by ransomnote
Using rate data recently released from the Department of Defense, Jessica Rose computes an under reporting factor (URF) for VAERS for spontaneous abortions is 118. Since there are 3,527 reports of SA in the US in 2021, this represents 416,186 actual events. But a small number of those were not caused by the vaccine, somewhere around 1%.
Here’s Jessica’s article on spontaneous abortions (SA) post-vaccination.
Using the DMED data, the five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182. So that’s 3.4X the baseline rate (when extended to an annual rate).
I’ve notified the CDC of this, but I don’t expect them to change their policy of recommending the vaccine to pregnant women.
Also note that pregnant women were NOT included in the vaccine trials. It is medical malpractice to recommend the vaccines to pregnant women. The CDC repeatedly declared them safe for pregnant women without complete data.
I don’t expect the mainstream media to question the CDC on this at all. I’m sure they will all ignore it.
Plenty of evidence in VAERS showing the vaccine messes with a woman’s reproductive organs just as we predicted from the biodistribution data (which targeted the ovaries).
You can view both the biodistribution data and the menstrual adverse effect data in this VAERS analysis article I wrote in November, 2022.
See also this article about IVF clinics and what happened in Singapore and syncytin-1.
For others, may I suggest if you disagree with this that you show us an error in the data or methodology?
Steve Kirsch is the Executive Director of Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (vacsafety.org). This article was originally published on Steve Kirsch’s substack.
PING
I had heard this would happen... All according to planDemic... Demonic...
And that’s the ones they admit.
There are those that are attributed to other reasons, so likely it’s far more.
Many a Vaxxer has the blood of innocents on their hands and it will never wash off
According to the pfizer trial data. THe mRNA therapy was 10% effective in creating spontaneous abortions.
BNT162b2
5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 1
5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including:
• 270 mother cases and 4 foetus/baby cases representing 270 unique pregnancies (the 4
foetus/baby cases were linked to 3 mother cases; 1 mother case involved twins).
• Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23),
outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with
intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1
each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were
reported for each twin, and both were counted)
I am going to call BS on this one....
I am not for forcing the shots by any means on anyone...but if you as an individual make the decision to get the shot(s) then I won’t complain either.
I am not for any type of passport...shot and no-shot people should be treated the same.
There are 3.7 million births in the US in one year roughly. That is a very large percentage increase in SA...and since I have ties to the medical community (family member a surgeon, who gave birth in Dec of 2021 btw) would have gotten wind of this.
She elected not to get the shots, and kept operating all the time up to her maternity leave btw. Healthy baby no complications...
One of those spontaneous abortions was the person who was gonna save us all from global warming.
Safety and efficiency of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding
Well, libs should be happy about all the miscarriages, especially among their target populations.
Actually, the pre-born ARE one of the left’s target populations.
I sure would like to see the trial data for pregnant women that was used for the EUA. Maybe your relative has seen it.
Interesting, pertinent and reassuring, but only an anecdote, nonetheless. Better luck next time! Thanks for playing!
That’s called a miscarriage
“I sure would like to see the trial data for pregnant women that was used for the EUA. Maybe your relative has seen it.”
—
She & her husband read what was available and that is why they elected not to get the shots....husband is in the Reserves and put in a religious exemption there.
Read what is available and make your own informed decision. Of course, personally I think that answer should be no almost all the time given information that is currently available.
Fear porn. Okay, mRNA vaccines in spike protein form are slightly more flawed than traditional protein-based vaccines. They were also far more effective against the original variants. Now we have traditional protein-based vaccines which are far more effective than most traditional vaccines. They’re even effective against the new variants. Corbevax and Novavax are two. And they don’t have to be stored at heroically low temperatures.
Every solution to every problem comes with drawbacks. Make the best decision you can with what you have to work with, AND GET ON WITH YOUR FRICKING LIFE.
Just wow. "slightly more flawed". Wow
Tell that to the families of those who died after taking the Jim Jones Jab. Tell that to those who are suffering from pericarditis, myocarditis, strokes, blood clots, amputations, palsy, and eye problems.
If it was "slightly more flawed", why is Pfizer asking for 75 YEARS to release their records that needed to be release prior to sticking people?
Ooh, so Planned Parenthood was involved in planning this?
Go figgur.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.