[smileyface]

Methinks early on the first recipients were more likely to receive placebo and have reduced AEs, to facilitate uptake of the masses.

[OldWarBaby]

There can’t be any real doubt that there were placebos in the mix early on. But I’ve been keeping track of the lot numbers of friends/workers/neighbors and I notice that some of the earliest have Moderna lots ending in -20A and those lots have shown up in VAERS as being the most problematic. Slightly later lots ending in -21A are much less troublesome. While I haven’t broken the “code” on the whole system I suggest people getting the jabs to be mindful of their own lots-—especially the boosters. There was a brief note by one of the farmas a few months ago that, later on, they cut the potency by something like 50X. Can’t trust ‘em, don’t actually know, but that was the claim. In any case the subsequent boosters are still going to do the dirty work.

[rodguy911]

You hit on a key item in the vax BS. At least half of the shots are placebo,designed to throw off anyone trying to make sense out of a myriad of loads in the bio-weapon. Truth is I doubt if anyone but big pharma knows what load they are getting. The best summary I heard was from Dr. Tenpenny who said that after three and for sure after four hits on the vax death machine you can be sure you don't have an immune system anymore its been severely compromised.

By the way TenPenny blew me away when she announced a little heard or acknowledged claim that she has spent over 50,000 yeah not 5k but 50k hours investigating/researching the bio-weapon controversy.I doubt anyone knows more about it than her.

From now on she will be my go-to person with that kind of knowledge.

I'm sensitive to how many hours one has spent on topic since I spend my share and know what it is.