One thing you have in common with those liberals is that you think your interpretation of Christianity is the only correct one. They think the same, and that your refusal to let the government help the poor is a rejection of Jesus’s real intent, along with your condemnation of gays as being any more sinful than a straight man who has sex out of wedlock, or is divorced.
“along with your condemnation of gays as being any more sinful than a straight man who has sex out of wedlock”
You are being dishonest. I’ve never suggested homosexuality is a super-sin. But I notice MOST people still reject adultery as admirable, while we are expected to praise and encourage homosexuality. The church is also under pressure to accept shacking up, but no Christian church can do so.
But “my interpretation” of Christianity may well be the correct one - IF IT IS ALIGNED WITH WHAT JESUS AND THE BIBLE TEACH. Liberal so-called Christians are quick to endorse government action over individual and even quicker to endorse any sexual perversion over the clear teaching of the Bible.
A distinguishing mark of liberal “Christianity” is to focus on SOCIAL sins rather than those we do as individuals, and to want us to “repent” of sins society may do rather than pay attention to the ones we actually are guilty of doing! It is rooted in a rejection of God the Creator and what He has revealed about Himself in the Bible. That is fine IF they would then admit they are not Christians. It is their insistence they can reject the Jesus of the Bible while being “true Christians” that I reject.