Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prof. Werner Bergholz: Dangerous Chemicals and Nanotubes Found In Covid Test Swabs
dailyexpose.uk ^ | JANUARY 28, 2022 | RHODA WILSON

Posted on 01/29/2022 8:27:28 AM PST by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2022 8:27:28 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt; datura; Fractal Trader; bagster; grey_whiskers; metmom; Jane Long; tatown; ...

PING


2 posted on 01/29/2022 8:27:43 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

More here.

https://photos.imageevent.com/shegen/sherriespictures/blog/video-1629811961.mp4


3 posted on 01/29/2022 8:31:20 AM PST by Tennessee Conservative (My goal in life is to be the person my dogs think I am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Here’s sumthin that doesn’t add up: A spit test uses carbon nanotubes. It’s kind of a ‘so what’ situation. The test swab itself which comes into contact with the human is a cotton Q-tip. What does it matter if the test uses toxic chemicals or nanotubes? Those processes take place outside the human body.


4 posted on 01/29/2022 8:36:02 AM PST by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

For the $hot $hills too lazy to look up REAL PROF. DR. WERNER BERGHOLZ’ bio....

17 years of industrial experience with technical and business responsibilities – 21 years in academia – 23 years in national and international standardization organizations.

OCCUPATION (excerpt)

October 2015 – today: Partner at ISC International Standards Consulting GmbH & Co. KG, Gehrden, Germany

September 2001 – June 2015 Professor of Electrical Engineering at Jacobs University Bremen, Germany

Research Topics microelectronic, photovoltaics, quality engineering, standardization

Official retirement 2015
October 1985 – August 2001: Siemens Semiconductor Division / Infineon Technologies

EDUCATION

April 1975: Diploma from Göttingen University Germany in Semiconductor Physics

July 1978: Dr. rer. nat. from Göttingen University Germany in Semiconductor Physics


5 posted on 01/29/2022 8:47:20 AM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I’d rather get a blood test. Don’t they do that?


6 posted on 01/29/2022 8:48:14 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("Okay. As long as the paperwork is clean, you boys can do what you like out there." -Fifi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

We deal with EO and its residuals all the time at work. There are defined limits for all. If there are appreciable amounts the swabs should not be sold. They are non-conforming and would generate a recall. It’s the manufacturer’s responsibility to ensure regulatory compliance when each lot is released.


7 posted on 01/29/2022 9:06:16 AM PST by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
What does it matter if the test uses toxic chemicals or nanotubes? Those processes take place outside the human body.

Can you read?

From the article: "Ethylene oxide is highly toxic – it causes cancer, it damages DNA – and it is found on the Covid test swabs.

The test swab enters your nose, is rubbed against the nasal mucosa (which has a rich blood supply), removed and then subject to the Covid-19 test.

I may remind you that this is why cocaine users "inhale" cocaine into the nasal chambers for rapid access to the users' systemic circulation.

8 posted on 01/29/2022 9:30:54 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

It sounds a lot to me like they’re looking at the test swabs AFTER they have been tested.

They’re just Q-tips. Replaceable by ordinary q-tips if one is that paranoid.


9 posted on 01/29/2022 9:42:31 AM PST by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I got a PCR test last Monday (it was negative) but I still feel where they did the test up in my nasal cavity. It feels like a cigarette burn.


10 posted on 01/29/2022 9:46:20 AM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
They’re just Q-tips. Replaceable by ordinary q-tips if one is that paranoid.

They are not ordinary Q-tips. The cotton swab (which looks like it is 10" long long so as to probe the deepest recesses of your nasal chamber) comes in a test tube package to which it will be returned before sending it off for analysis.

The cotton swab cannot be replaced by an ordinary Q-tip.

How you ever had a Covid-19 test?

11 posted on 01/29/2022 10:03:25 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

Yes I have had a test and it was an ordinary Q-tip.


12 posted on 01/29/2022 10:06:07 AM PST by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Yes I have had a test and it was an ordinary Q-tip.

An ordinary Q-tip is not long enough to reach the deepest recesses of the nasal chamber (the nasopharynx) which is what the test requires.

13 posted on 01/29/2022 10:13:44 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

My test swab was about 2” long. If one is paranoid about this then they can add their own cotton swab to their own long length of wood.


14 posted on 01/29/2022 10:24:19 AM PST by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
My test swab was about 2” long. If one is paranoid about this then they can add their own cotton swab to their own long length of wood.

Wanna bet they won't allow that?

Cotton swab that they provide is part of a kit. Their swab is sterile and isolated in a sealed test tube to which it is returned.

15 posted on 01/29/2022 10:36:06 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I’ve never trusted the swabs they use. At first I figured it was a tool to collect DNA from as many people as possible for a hideous database.

Then I wondered why they wouldn’t plant something in a person using this tool. Of course they would oyf they could. And they can.


16 posted on 01/29/2022 10:49:30 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (When government fears the people, there is liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

I’ll bet, if you allow the bet to include that <5” ordinary cotton swabs are what constitute the test now.


17 posted on 01/29/2022 10:54:53 AM PST by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Not interested in taking your money.

Go to youtube and search PCR test. Quite a few videos will pop up. Look at one or two or all for that matter. I chose this one because of the definitive graphics.

Go look at all if you wish and then come back on this board and tell me again that an ordinary Q-tip can be used. As well, look at the length of the cotton swab used and tell me it is the “size” of a Q-tip.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akiXEfWW-V0&t=175s&ab_channel=TheGuardian


18 posted on 01/29/2022 11:47:53 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

No. You only need to put it in 1/2 - 1 inch.


19 posted on 01/29/2022 11:51:38 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

Not interested in taking your money.
***Then why did ya say “wanna bet?”

Go to youtube and search PCR test.
***No thank you.

Quite a few videos will pop up.
***Good for them.

Look at one or two or all for that matter.
***No thank you. You do your homework, I’ll do mine.

I chose this one because of the definitive graphics.
***I tested with what was available at the time.

Go look at all
***Again, no thank you. You go and fetch, yourself.

if you wish and then come back on this board
***Again. Do your own homework. Go ahead. Fetch.

and tell me again that an ordinary Q-tip can be used.
***I used an ordinary Q-tip. An ordinary Q-tip was used. An ordinary Q-tip can be used.

As well, look at the length of the cotton swab used and tell me it is the “size” of a Q-tip.
***As well, do your own homework but by that time there won’t be any “pandemic” with a 99.7% survivability rating.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akiXEfWW-V0&t=175s&ab_channel=TheGuardian
***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUSwucLOWqM


20 posted on 01/29/2022 11:54:18 AM PST by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson