Screw you Neil Young and all the other celebrities who want to infringe on my rights and free speech.
Posted on 01/28/2022 6:22:04 PM PST by nickcarraway
Who cares?
Joe Rogan toxic? Reminds me of what people who never listened to Rush would say about him.
Libs will do anything to get their way, yet they ignore a million people opposing their tyranny in Canada, but write multiple stories about this egghead bullsh*t.
<< In a show of support, Nils Lofgren also had his music removed from Spotify. “We will miss the $3.28 we get a year but we will forge ahead righteously,” the rocker’s wife remarked >>
Self-righteously, she means.
Nils Lofgren? I haven’t heard that name since the Reagan Administration. Neil Young continues his tantrum, hitting the edge of his high chair with his little decorative spoon.
Neil Young is an arrogant prick who thinks that he is a lot more important than he really is. He really sucks as a musician and human being. Most people can care less about him or his opinions.
The HO train man got just what he wanted.
Barry Manilow cashed in on the song, “I Write the Songs”, which he didnt write........shameful!
Who the hell are these people? Young and Crosby are has been’s and the others are never was.
Barry Manilow wasn’t actually demanding his songs be taken off Spotify. Neither was Bruce Johnston.
Many of the most famous musicians during the 60’s and 70’s have turned into some of the biggest conformists and bleating sheep you ever saw.
Communist scum always coagulates quickly...
Who’s Neil Young?
Except for people at the fringes most people don’t care what these people think.
I’ve played in dance/cover bands all of my adult life. I regularly would do something of neils - just so I could mock his super-whiney voice.
“promoting lies about COVID-19 vaccines”
So we are to believe that Colin Powell was saved by the vaccine? That there are no Covid-19 cases in Israel because they are vexed and boosted? Nobody can even ask these and other questions?
Would anyone not being say, an accountant, a physical therapist, etc. suddenly say anyone in said fields of expertise are not allowed a disagreement? Does a journalist have a say in debates about accountancy or the merits of a particular therapy, just based on their anointed “authorities”? Seriously?
Are we never to question what anyone has to say just because they have a doctorate? Ok, so do I, and I question this entire narrative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.