Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Veto!

The J&J shot is just not that good. People like it because it’s a non-RNA vaccine, but results have been pretty mediocre. It is better than nothing, and better than the Chinese and Russian vaxes.


4 posted on 01/25/2022 6:09:29 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: proxy_user
The J&J shot is just not that good. People like it because it’s a non-RNA vaccine, but results have been pretty mediocre. It is better than nothing, and better than the Chinese and Russian vaxes.

Some have indicated the J&J shot has been more effective against Omicron than the mRNA shots. With so much misinformation from all sides, who really knows.

10 posted on 01/25/2022 6:14:51 PM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

Nothing has been pretty good for us.

Prayers for Katy.


25 posted on 01/25/2022 6:24:18 PM PST by GreyHoundSailor (LGBTQ - Let's Get Brandon To Quit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user
But the Johnson & Johnson vaccine may not be as effective against the omicron variant compared to other vaccines. Dr. Craig Spencer, an emergency room doctor in New York, said that those who had one dose of Johnson & Johnson vaccine experienced worse COVID-19 symptoms from omicron. Tiredness, weakness, shortness of breath and cough were common COVID-19 symptoms among the Johnson & Johnson group.
34 posted on 01/25/2022 6:29:32 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user
The J&J shot is just not that good. People like it because it’s a non-RNA vaccine

When I got it last May I wanted a one and done shot. The shot is adenovirus-based gene therapy which ends up producing RNA in the body. I think the main difference is that the RNA is a lower and steady dose with fewer side effects than getting the RNA injected directly.

But since her shot was last Sept it has probably worn off. Mine from last May has certainly worn off.

47 posted on 01/25/2022 6:38:46 PM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

I was watching a show the other day and they were saying that the Russian Vax is outperforming all the others. Given the choice, I would probably choose JNJ, or even the Russian Vax over Pfizer. Too many bad stories out there on Pfizer.


60 posted on 01/25/2022 6:56:26 PM PST by TBall (Gibrn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

Why do people still think that the J&J vax doesn’t deliver an mRNA payload. It does. Rather than using lipids to get the mRNA into cells it uses a virus to deliver the payload. They all work the same. Fake the body to create spike proteins with a immune booster to make the immune system perk up. Flooding the body with spike proteins was a bad idea. Didn’t work and we are now living with the side effects. Spike didn’t stay attached to the cell like they thought it would, it didn’t stay in the arm like they thought it would …. The didn’t even test for bio distribution of the spikes. Dumb Dumb Dumb. Not dumb it’s criminal.

The vax (all of them) has failed. Ask the question - why did they want to flood your body with the spike? Why are they getting ready to demand you take another one when it does NOT work.

How stupid is the average American? Apparently pretty dumb.


96 posted on 01/25/2022 7:30:12 PM PST by wgmalabama (We will find out if the Vac or virus risk was the correct choice - can we put truth above narrative )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson