Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: woodbutcher1963

I haven’t seen Thackney post in a while. The pipeline is proposed to go to Kitimat. It is like the only fjord that ships can get it and take it to Asia. The greenies don’t care that even if there was a rupture in the Keystone pipeline that because the oil is so viscous, it won’t flow anywhere.


33 posted on 01/21/2022 7:12:56 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: crusty old prospector

I know the Canadians approved the expansion of the current pipeline from Alberta to Vancouver. I believe that it is going to at least double the capacity.
The problem with the Vancouver pipeline is that it does not terminate at a port facility that is deep enough to load a supertanker. Therefore, they have to transload the oil onto a smaller tanker and then take it out to where the transpacific supertanker sits at anchor.

The Kitimat port will be able to load directly onto the supertankers. When these two are both up and running it will lower the cost of crude on the west coast. It is good for the consumer, bad for the people selling Alaskan crude.


34 posted on 01/21/2022 7:41:51 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson