I’m sorry, I just have a hard time believing this is true.
Why hasn’t Rand Paul made something of these figures?
Our side is nearly as guilty of hype and panic-mongering as the left is. IMHO, of course.
There’s no proof what they’re dying of, just that insurance companies are paying out 40% above “normal” for 18-64 y/o.
To borrow a phrase (sort of) .... I post, YOU decide.
Which figures don't you believe? The huge increase in the dearth rate between the ages of 18 and 64 came from one of the largest life insurance providers in the country. No authorities that I am aware of have disputed the figures. And the average age of people who died with Covid has been longer than the expected life span in most countries. Again, I am not aware of any authorities disputing this.
So what conclusions do you draw from these facts that do not appear to be disputed? Do you think that the vaccines, lockdowns, masks, etc... are helping people 18-64? If so why?
“Our side is nearly as guilty of hype and panic-mongering as the left is.”
I think that’s true - especially the non-stop use of anecdotal “evidence”.
But in defense of our side - it is the other side that has totally corrupted the mortality stats regarding all things Covid. They have literally paid hospitals tens of thousands of $$ to assign Covid as cause of death - and they have given them legal protection from charges of medical fraud by encouraging them to call it Covid when in doubt. Their ostensible reason for this was to “err on the side of safety”, but the real reason was Fauci fear-mongering.
With the Covid mortality rates so utterly corrupted, distilling the effect of vaccines on those mortality rates is impossible.
It is true. Search on Scott Davison OneAmerica insurance.
Oh, I know it. Most Americans are going to have a hard time believing it.
When this all comes out... I suspect its going to be epic.