IOW, you can't use the original and proven source of all the lies and the perpetrator of the entire hoax.
bagster wrote: “I think we’ve established that the CDC is as full of sh*t as you are, so why are you trying to use them as proof that the vaccines are ‘effective’.”
IOW, we can only use sources that support the anti-vaxxer narrative?
“Also, answer my questions and stop being insubordinate and uppity. Would the lady have died if she had the vax? And if not, how is it that you know that, keeping in mind that the vax doesn’t work and ruins the immune system?”
You just didn’t like the answers.
IOW, you can't use the original and proven source of all the lies and the perpetrator of the entire hoax.
We'll never know, since you didn't answer the questions.
a.) Would the lady have died if she had taken the fake vax that doesn't work and ruins the immune system?
b.) If your answer is no, how do you know this?
#KeepTrying
“IOW, we can only use sources that support the anti-vaxxer narrative?”
Q team leader baggie has never been shy about rejecting any source that is tainted with countervailing information. That’s part of their charm. Team Q shares the Pol Pot regime’s utter hostility to the educated classes, but with the mountain of skulls part.