Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gas_dr

“read the cdc statement”

I’m pretty sure that by all examples given so far the CDC cannot be trusted to tell you/us one lick of truth.

Here is where you need to step back and ask “Would they lie?” before you support them as a source of factual information.

Their information is just not working “in the real world”.

But you probably have to parrot them or lose your license or practice. But you are not required to also go out of your way to try and insult our intelligence...


30 posted on 01/05/2022 12:16:29 PM PST by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Openurmind

That is a real nonsequiter. You presented information that is patently false. If you choose not to believe the information because you think the CDC is lying, then so be it. But the actual tests and panels distinguish between diseases. I run these panels on a regular basis. Instead of getting an answer to one disease process off a swab, I get 6 tests.

Its just like the draw one tube of blood and get 7 chemistries, liver profile, bilirubin totals, and protein. Its called a panel for a reason.

I am not required to parrot anything and do not have my license threatened — so that is a mother nonsequiter. Its total crap. It is my job to present what actually it, but you can believe it or not.


43 posted on 01/05/2022 12:35:59 PM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson