Be concerned but calm in the observation that many link to sources they have no DIRECT experience with, no DIRECT observation or participation undertaken.
In other words, HEARSAY.
And why do such non witnesses carry on this way?
“I saw it on the internet, so it must be true.”
“It’s from a government or government linked source, so it must be true.”
“The link provides statistics, so it must be true.”
“The math behind the statistics has equations and sciency stuff, so it must be true.”
“Trust the Science!”
Now see #32 above.
Full disclosure: I haved served as an expert editor in peer review of manuscripts submitted to serious scientific journals for publication. The standards of scientific publication have in decades past been exceedingly high, at least in most prestigious journals. The standards encompass generalizability, ability to replicate results. Scientific misconduct in past decades has been rare but today it stands at the door.
It is an affront to see people bandying about links to “official” chicanery who haven’t the foggiest idea of what they are touting and who in any event are unqualified to present nor are capable of defending their absconded thesis. In other words, they are fools attempting to claim relevancy while casting out those they deem themselves to be beneath them.
In this era of “Fauci”, following a false ethos of “fake but accurate”, Americans should not be so gullible to wolves clothed in lab coats with government credentials pointing to “studies”, “statistics”, “experts” as “evidence”, “proof” as a final disposition on matters bandied about.
Be enriched and informed by looking up “Lysenko” and “Lysenkoism.”
Then, you will know better where we stand as Americans in our enemy’s playbook, a playbook which has four well-known phases, of which the American People are being led to transition between phases two and three.
So what are we to believe, who are we to trust?
“By their fruits, you will know them.”
A person of integrity, a scientist of discipline and discernment, will fold their arms saying “let’s see what plays out, let’s watch what unfolds”, and then BE SILENT while the truth emerges.
.....
Thank you for that wisdom.
Seems the world has fallen in to quite a trap. If we say and do nothing or if we do and say something. The devil owns the media.
Ahem. I made an argument that the sort of conspiracy posited in the OP (ie there is a grand plot to kill people with toxic vaccines being perpetrated by vaccine manufacturers taking turns issuing toxic batches) is unlikely because it would also have to involve thousands of lab workers all over the world tasked with batch checking — which is a logical conclusion. I did not rely on “statistics and science stuff” (unlike the OP). Yes, I provided a “government linked source” as an example of how batch checking works in the UK. If you think that chart of how batch checking is done in the UK is not true, fine.
Your reply at #32 (yeah, but what about this Lancet study about HCQ that got yanked?) was a non sequitir. Replace vaccines with aircraft and it goes like this:
OP posits that there is a grand conspiracy among aircraft manufacturers to produce defective aircraft in batches, taking turns with each other releasing the defective aircraft, all part of a plot to decrease the surplus population.
I reply that this conspiracy would have to involve thousands of aircraft technicians at both the factories and at airports worldwide, as safety inspections are required in nearly every country and are routinely performed.
You reply: What about this study on the caloric and nutritional content of airline food that got pulled from this scientific journal?
See the disconnect now?