To: bitt
That photo might’ve been published in 2016, but ain’t no way it was TAKEN in 2016. 1986-1996 period maybe.
7 posted on
01/02/2022 11:14:19 AM PST by
MayflowerMadam
(When government fears the people, there is liberty.)
To: MayflowerMadam
“That photo might’ve been published in 2016, but ain’t no way it was TAKEN in 2016. 1986-1996 period maybe.”
That picture of the Hildebeast had to have been taken at least 30 years ago.
19 posted on
01/02/2022 11:20:26 AM PST by
wjcsux
(RIP Rush Limbaugh 12 Jan 1951- 17 Feb 2021. We really miss you. 😢)
To: MayflowerMadam
That’s mid 80’s J.Crew fashion.
24 posted on
01/02/2022 11:23:52 AM PST by
blackdog
(Jab Dodger. )
To: MayflowerMadam
Exactly what I was thinking. It’s at least 20 to 25 years old. There is only so much you can do with photoshop.
35 posted on
01/02/2022 11:32:58 AM PST by
llevrok
(Pronouns: Me/myself/& I)
To: MayflowerMadam
but ain’t no way it was TAKEN in 2016I thought the same thing. It's an odd choice. Publishing a picture like this just reminds people of how ... well, I want to be a gentleman ... "not young and not healthy" she looks now.
65 posted on
01/02/2022 12:48:02 PM PST by
sphinx
To: MayflowerMadam
That photo might’ve been published in 2016, but ain’t no way it was TAKEN in 2016. 1986-1996 period maybe.
Partner, u ain't lying!!!
This photo had to have been during the Arkancide years.
What a joke if you runs in 2024?
To: MayflowerMadam
80 posted on
01/02/2022 1:45:40 PM PST by
leaning conservative
(snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson