What evidence does she have? I don't remember seeing what she has, has anybody else seen it? Is this the same evidence Mike Lindell had during his symposium?
Does she expect the committee will listen to her? Doe she think they will say, "You know Sidney, this is great stuff, we're going to overturn the election now, and disband this committee"? It's all closed door, I don't believe anything that comes out or will ever come out of that committee.
She may think this is a good idea, but no R should give the illegal committee the time of day, regardless of wanting to show the evidence or not.
I think she’s being a little unwise. What on earth makes her think for one minute that they’re going to let her present it? They’ll just tell her that this is about the “insurrection”, and they’re not interested in anything else.